“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any on the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after a ways they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not signify that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This kind of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of previous witnessed.
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It is additionally a nicely-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.
Capital Punishment: Section 302 PPC offers for the death penalty given that the primary form of punishment for intentional murder. The offender may very well be sentenced to death as retribution for taking the life of another human being unlawfully.
Normally, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (like those in very clear violation of founded case regulation) to your higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, plus the case is just not appealed, the decision will stand.
record with the department there is not any record accessible whatsoever regarding promotion in the petitioner(Promotion)
The different roles of case regulation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in the way that courts render decisions. Common regulation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale guiding their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and sometimes interpret the broader legal principles.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar problem. When they sue their landlord, the court must use the previous court’s decision in applying the legislation. This example of case legislation refers to 2 cases read while in the state court, within the same level.
department concerned shall deliver the complete list of ACRs with the concerned officer to DPC well in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
Please note, In case you are seeking a charge exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
In some important cases of international law jurisdictions, case law is often applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family law.
ten. Without touching the merits from the case from the issue of annual increases within the pensionary emoluments from the petitioner, in terms of policy decision from the provincial government, this kind of annual increase, if permissible during the case of employees of KMC, involves further assessment to be made with the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance due to funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
13309-B of 2010 for being weak types of evidence as well as the evidentiary value whereof would be noticed on the time in the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Therefore, confirmed custody in the petitioner in jail is not likely to serve any advantageous purpose at this stage.”
It's also important to note that granting of seniority to your civil servant without the actual duration of service just about violates the entire service structure like a civil servant inducted in Grade seventeen by claiming these types of benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher grade, which is neither the intention from the regulation nor from the equity. Read more